Dealing with emission tampering

Lucas Deal September 26, 2013

If you provide engine service in your facilities, there’s a chance at some point a customer has asked you to modify his rig’s emission system.

While there’s no rule against asking, there are some pretty hefty violations associated with actually following through.

Tampering with emissions equipment is prohibited in the commercial vehicle industry. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is vigilant in investigating and prosecuting fleets, truck owners and service facilities found violating emissions tampering rules.

The force of its punishments can be extreme.

According to EPA guidelines, service providers can be found liable for emissions tampering not only for altering an engine, emission and associated electrical system, but also for not reporting — to the EPA, vehicle owner or both — when evidence of tampering is found in during engine-related service work.

The risk associated with these rules has spurred the Technology and Maintenance Council (TMC) to create a task force in its S.16 Service Provider study group on emissions tampering.

Formed earlier this year, TMC’s task force hopes to build a recommended practice to educate service providers on the dangers of emissions tampering, and provide a course of action when encountering vehicles that have experienced emissions tampering.

The group held a panel discussion at TMC’s fall meeting earlier this month with representatives from Navistar, Cummins and the EPA.

Moderated by Task Force Chairman Peter Savage, operations manager at Clarke Power Services, the group addressed why emission tampering is illegal, the violations and possible punishments for tampering and how the industry can work together to remove it from marketplace.

While emission tampering isn’t a new problem, it is one that has grown recently with the rapid development of EPA emission regulations.

Bill Puchniarz, manager, inline field services at Navistar, says emission tampering qualifies as “anything that takes a vehicle out of its EPA/CARB certified state.”

Removing a DPF or blocking its usage within an emission system is one of the most common methods for engine tampering, Puchniarz says. Other methods include alternating the after treatment system and electrical modifications, such as increasing the amount of fuel that is delivered to an engine or programming that diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) is being used when it is not.

View this article on one page


Do you actively capture and use customer data?


Trailer orders up 45% in 2014

DuraClass debuts heavy-duty dump truck body

June Class 8 orders a pleasant surprise


Caterpillar engine lawsuits consolidated, new suits continue to be filed

New COE OEM entering market, building dealer network

Another MaxxForce lawsuit filed

Successful Dealer Award

Click here to read about the award and see the nominees for this year's award.